|
By:Pat Zukeran
Understanding Archaeology
Christianity is a historical faith based on actual
events recorded in the Bible. Archaeology has there
ed a key role in biblical studies and Christian apologetics
in several ways.
First, archaeology has confirmed the historical accuracy
of the Bible. It has verified many ancient sites,
civilizations, and biblical characters whose existence
was questioned by the academic world and often dismissed
as myths. Biblical archaeology has silenced many critics
as new discoveries supported the facts of the Bible.
Second, archaeology helps us improve our understanding
of the Bible. Although we do not have the original
writings of the authors, thousands of ancient manuscripts
affirm that we have an accurate transmission of the
original texts.{1} Archaeology can also help us to
understand more accurately the nuances and uses of
biblical words as they were used in their day.
Third, archaeology helps illustrate and explain Bible
passages. The events of the Bible occurred at a certain
time, in a particular culture, influenced by a particular
social and political structure. Archaeology gives
us insights into these areas. Archaeology also helps
to supplement topics not covered in the Bible. Much
of what we know of the religions and the intertestamental
period comes from archaeological research.
As we approach this study we must keep in mind the
limits of archaeology. First, it does not prove the
divine inspiration of the Bible. It can only confirm
the accuracy of the events. Second, unlike other fields
of science, archaeology cannot re-create the process
under study. Archaeologists must study and interpret
the evidence left behind. All conclusions must allow
for revision and reinterpretation based on new discoveries.
Third, how archaeological evidence is understood depends
on the interpreter's presuppositions and world view.
It is important to understand that many researchers
are skeptics of the Bible and hostile to its world
view.
Fourth, thousands of archives have been discovered,
but an enormous amount of material has been lost.
For example, the library in Alexandria held over one
million volumes, but all were lost in a seventh century
fire.
Fifth, only a fraction of available archaeological
sites have been surveyed, and only a fraction of surveyed
sites have been excavated. In fact, it is estimated
that less than two percent of surveyed sites have
been worked on. Once work begins, only a fraction
of an excavation site is actually examined, and only
a small part of what is examined is published. For
example, the photographs of the Dead Sea Scrolls were
withheld from the public for forty years after they
were uncovered.
It is important to understand that the Scriptures
remain the primary source of authority. We must not
elevate archaeology to the point that it becomes the
judge for the validity of Scripture. Randall Price
states, "There are indeed instances where the
information needed to resolve a historical or chronological
question is lacking from both archaeology and the
Bible, but it is unwarranted to assume the material
evidence taken from the more limited content of archaeological
excavations can be used to dispute the literary evidence
from the more complete content of the canonical scriptures."{2}
The Bible has proven to be an accurate and trustworthy
source of history.
Noted archaeologist Nelson Glueck writes, "As
a matter of fact, however, it may be clearly stated
categorically that no archeological discovery has
ever controverted a single biblical reference. Scores
of archeological findings have been made which confirm
in clear outline or exact detail historical statements
in the Bible."{3}
|